The name "Marco Winter", "Schoenau & Partners", "Franz J. Dorschner," 'Agency for fashion and leisure ", and so on Google and in many forums already present in large numbers and are increasingly discussed. However, one never finds a real solution to these pages, should one be well advised to dub this iosen "ring".
The scam:
Referred is the internet on online recruitment services for a "free" activity as an advertising medium.
Similar ads are listed as following:
What is written in the ads, it all sounds very tempting. If you follow the Internet addresses of the impression is no less good. The really brazen to the whole: It is aimed at pupils, students and other bona fide, non-conflict groups ready.
but it appears in the branches of this company, it will be fast with a so-called mediation fee of € 214.20 or alternatively lockable subscription to a newspaper for a period of 2 years faced. In return, an advertising orders are promised as an advertising medium.
in Item 7 of the terms and conditions you signed of course there in the office needs to take to begin the activity, can contain even get paid that one difference between the amounts incurred for subscription and advertising revenue after 2 years. This therefore makes no financial loss ...
The catch to this way of thinking is probably notice some do not even have the right from point 7 to be lulled into complacency that we have come to the company that raised money earn and not to output it for a subscription.
It therefore goes to the practice of the activity in advance.
=> GROSS ERROR!
tricks and methods:
Following the above-mentioned websites turns out (after a of time) as a problem. For you leave the links to the homepages of 1-2 months without prejudice, we must then determine that there are given no more domains. Strange, right? ...
The questions posed to me as an honest Internet users are:
change Why are the domains of this company ever (for the content of the web pages appear, in principle, on the other again )? and
enough not only a company homepage?
last question you should really be "yes" answer, But who is this anomaly to have when you "make money" only the goal in mind and each desperately believes the means to have a solution to the problem?
Another thing that seems very dubious, is the time between contract and in fact report the activity. Because it takes 4-6 weeks to get the responsible office, which manages the subscription, with a report to confirm this. You get only a 2 weeks notice given for the subscription.
How to announce something before then if it does not can be assessed within the period of notice?
also very doubtful, this chain of names that are on the contract to be concluded. Alone on the first sheet 3 addresses are noted. The subscription, the real sticking point, then, but managed by another person (Franz J. Dorsey). Is it long enough in the "game", we learn that this is only an intermediary that forwards the subscription to the end PVZ (press distribution center) in Stockelsdorf. For the latter, a feedback from Ciao: HERE
The contract is written, that the revocation of Mr. Franz J. Dorschner was sent.
My question: Should the Treaty not be there terminated / revoked, where I have him signed?
How do I get out of the contract? (Tips):
difficult it is to the contract, because you yourself signed in person.
Should be within the 14-day cancellation period:
- without further notice in writing (or recorded, that is via registered mail with return receipt, opening, courier, etc.) announce the completed subscription.
- Send In the same way an immediate termination of the contract to the respective branch.
If you are outside of this period: revoke
- also contracts and subscriptions.
- turn on legal expenses and, with the help of a lawyer
- take lawyer
- (It's also all without a lawyer, but it is nerve-wracking!)
revocation:
Since this is apparently not even a legitimate company or reputable companies for the subscription respective competent company will do everything possible to push through the closed subscription to their own advantage. Popular
this is the establishment of a force that the contesting of the facts set out withdrawal, the request for the submission of evidence on the conclusion of the contract followed by a confirmation of the requested cancellation by the year 20xx + 2, and so
important here:
- A peaceful à If you have written in your notice that the contract with immediate effect and withdrawing the benefit of debit, you have done everything necessary on your part.
- Do not be intimidated by empty threats!
- formulate the withdrawal can not be challenged à reasons for the withdrawal you can always challenge.
- If necessary, build up their own threatening scenario à threaten to initiate legal action or forwarding the case to a district court or the prosecutor because of suspected fraud, turning to the public (media).
- amounts debited back book now!
- engage Not great on correspondence with the company!
- not respond to court orders (NOTE: Revoking must in any case, the official court order!)
outcome of the case in person X:
Person X, an acquaintance, who asked not to be named is the same company / business fell for and signed the Berlin branch of the company "Schoenau & Partner" in late May 2009 the contract as an advertising medium.
More than 14 days after the contract is for the first X have realized what he had to be admitted there, and had then had all sorts of trouble and expense to iron out his stupidity. X went to the free legal advice, had to formulate revocations and terminations and by sending him this is about 10 € in costs incurred, even though he originally wanted to earn money with this activity.
When the confirmation of the PVZ at his house fluttered, X did not know what he should do even more. He asked his parents, who had legal expenses insurance, and inquired of the insurance if this is true for legal protection for him, because he still live with his parents. X was the first time lucky!
X sought a lawyer. The PVZ wrote him two letters. The first was related to his termination letter with a request for proof of such a contract and the subsequent termination of his subscriptions confirmed for 2011. switched Now a lawyer, wrote an angry letter to the PVZ and immediately recognized the company to the notice, sent requests for payment as declared void and said, already sent papers to be considered as promotional gifts.
To date, X has not heard a word from the office or the PVZ more ...
Thanks to Person X for the report of their case!
0 comments:
Post a Comment